Donald Trump's closing speech at the G7 summit was a spectacle of incoherence and confusion, revealing his true feelings about the Iran deal. The speech was a rambling, incoherent mess, with Trump struggling to articulate his thoughts and justify his actions. He spent 32 minutes defending the deal, but failed to mention any discussions among G7 countries, instead focusing on his personal achievements and the death of General Soleimani.
Trump's obsession with Soleimani was evident, as he repeatedly referred to him as a 'mad genius' and 'the boss of Iran'. This fixation was a clear attempt to boost his own ego and distract from the deal's shortcomings. The speech was filled with bizarre asides, such as praising Bibi Netanyahu for being 'a little excited' and claiming that Afghanistan was 'kissing our ass'.
The deal itself was described as a long-term achievement, despite being a three-month agreement. Trump's claim that he 'killed General Soleimani' was a clear attempt to take credit for the deal, even though Soleimani has been dead since 2020. The speech was a desperate attempt to justify the deal and distract from the fact that it lacked substance and clarity.
Trump's lack of understanding of the deal's implications was evident, as he struggled to answer questions about its content. He claimed that the deal would prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons, but when pressed, he admitted that there was nothing specific in the deal about nuclear weapons. This was a clear indication that Trump was making up the rules as he went along, and that the deal was a mere facade.
The speech also revealed Trump's desperation to maintain his power and influence. He claimed that world leaders were 'the most respected country in the world' because of him, and that they would 'get hit again' if Iran didn't behave. This was a clear indication that Trump was using his position to manipulate and control others, rather than to negotiate and collaborate.
In conclusion, Donald Trump's closing speech at the G7 summit was a spectacle of incoherence and desperation. It revealed his true feelings about the Iran deal, which he clearly did not think was a good deal. His obsession with General Soleimani and his desperate attempts to justify the deal were a clear indication of his lack of understanding and his willingness to manipulate and control others.
